Mull briefly on this claim: Any argument which stems ultimately from induction, because it is based on generalizing from a limited observation rather than from the whole set of data, cannot be verified to be true. Is it self-referencing, self-refuting, defensible, or something else?
(If you came from facebook, click on the “view original post” link to see animations and formatting, the article’s much prettier that way. If you were invited, it’s because I thought you might enjoy a little joyful reminder of the pragmatism you once studied. peace.) No doubt that one of the most salient sources of […]